Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)

Derivatives and Fair Value Measurements

Derivatives and Fair Value Measurements

9 Months Ended

Mar. 30, 2013

From time to time, we may use interest rate swaps or other instruments to manage our interest rate exposure and reduce the impact of future interest rate changes. These financial instruments are not used for trading or speculative purposes.



	Effective Date	Notational Amount	Fixed LIBOR Rate		Maturity Date
Interest Rate Swap	September 1, 2011	$10 million	0.7650	%	September 1, 2013
Interest Rate Swap	September 1, 2011	$10 million	0.9025	%	March 1, 2014
Interest Rate Swap	September 1, 2011	$10 million	1.0700	%	September 1, 2014

FASB Codification No. 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”), defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. Assets and liabilities measured at fair value are grouped in three levels. The levels prioritize the inputs used to measure the fair value of the assets or liabilities. These levels are:


◦	Level 1 – Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.


◦	Level 2 – Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for assets and liabilities, either directly or indirectly. These inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are less active.


◦	Level 3 – Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity for assets or liabilities and includes certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques.

The following financial liabilities are measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands):



	Fair Value Measurements Using
Period Ended	Total		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)	Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Interest Rate Swaps
March 30, 2013	$	174	—	$	174	—
June 30, 2012	$	209	—	$	209	—

Contingent Consideration
March 30, 2013	—		—	—		—
June 30, 2012	—		—	—		—

The fair value of the interest rate swap agreements were derived from discounted cash flow analysis based on the terms of the contract and the forward interest rate curves adjusted for our credit risk, which fall in level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. We used the historical results and projected cash flows based on the contractually defined terms, discounted as necessary, to estimate the fair value of the contingent consideration for Art Gun. Accordingly, the fair value measurement for contingent consideration falls in level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The contingent consideration for Art Gun is remeasured at the end of each reporting period.

The following table summarizes the fair value and presentation in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets for derivatives as of March 30, 2013, and June 30, 2012.



	March 30, 2013			June 30, 2012
Accrued expenses	$	73		$	—
Deferred tax liabilities	(67		)	(80		)
Other liabilities	101			209
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	$	107		$	129